How can a conversational personal contract improve self-directed learning?
I read about the ASKs system for online collaboration. ASKS addresses some problems of groupwork in any online environment. The system enables the instructor to build a repository of model responses that can easily be incorporated into tailored feedback for students. It makes evaluation easy and efficient. Meaningful feedback can be constructed for each student from an existing database. Frequency or quality of student contributions can be assessed. This factor reduces the subjective element common to the evaluation of online discussions.
The importance of content providers in elearning:
With the increase of social tools, learners and teachers will be able to create new ways of learning environments.
Themes in educational institutions to be changed:
- Students owning their learning
- Standards and curricula that guide rather than dictate
- Constructivist teaching strategies that empower students
- Trust and adult supervision
- Democracy and empowerment
- Global Workforce Competence: Making schooling relevant to the workplace. Nordgren (2006)
Web 2.0
Weblogs (Blogger, Wordpress), microblogging environments (Jaiku, Twitter), social repositories of new media objects (Flickr, Youtube), social bookmarking spaces (del.icio.us), community portals (Facebook, MySpace) etc. give new freedom and increase creativity and responsibility for the learners.
The main change in industries will be the reorganisation of knowledge creation at horisontal (between industries and universities) and vertical (within industry) level (Beach 2003).
Main changes at new Web 2.0 social spaces:
- Self-manageable tools;
- Learning at personal spaces;
- Continuous invasion to new spaces
- Distributing one’s personality between spaces;
- Community as an identity
- Publishing artifacts to define communities and ourselves
Self-directed learning and self-management of learning objectives is paramount.
Self-directed learning leads to the need of learner defined contracts (ePortfolio)
Conversational contracts presume that as learning procedure continues the contracts should be updated.
The construction and reconstruction of the learning process should consist of:
- sustaining self-conversation with oneself about learning
- externalizing learning conversation for the learner
- passing the control back to the learner as the language of awareness and skills of learning
- this process goes in spirals, initiating learning networks
Students answer the following questions in the process dialog:
- What is my purpose in learning? (purpose phase)
- Which learning startegies do i follow? (startegy phase)
- What is my learning outcome? (outcome phase)
- How do i evaluate my learning outcome? Was the startegy effective? (review phase)
Support dialog:
peer support, resources and space for coping with the new freedom.
Referent dialog:
A set of rules - mutually agreed and then followed.
- Why I wish to learn something, what is meaningful for me?
- What is my strategy to achieve it? What is the order of my actions?
- How do I know that I was successful? What worked and what did not?
Group Contracts
Keeping this public unwritten contract is the basis of any functioning activity system, the distribution of labour and the establishment of norms inside the community
Personal Learning Contract
Step 1: Diagnose your learning needs. A learning need is the gap between where you are now and where you want to be in regard to a particular set of competencies.
Step 2: Specify your learning objectives. Each of the learning needs diagnosed in Step 1 should be translated into a learning objective.
Step 3: Specify learning resources and strategies. describe how you propose to go about accomplishing each objective. Identify the resources (material and human) you plan to use in your various learning experiences and the strategies (techniques, tools) you will employ in making use of them.
Step 4: Specify target dates for completion. Put realistic dates, unless there are institutionally or other required deadlines.
Step 5: Specify evidence of accomplishment. what evidence you will collect to indicate the degree to which you have achieved each objective.
Step 6: Specify how the evidence will be validated. For each objective, first specify the criteria by which you propose the evidence will be judged.
Step 7: Review your contract with consultants. you will find it useful to review it with two or three friends, supervisors, or other expert resource people to obtain their reaction and suggestions.
- Are the learning objectives clear, understandable, and realistic? Do they describe what you propose to learn?
- Can they think of other objectives you might consider?
- Do the learning strategies and resources seem reasonable, appropriate, and efficient?
- Can they think of other resources and strategies you might consider?
- Does the evidence seem relevant to the various objectives, and would it convince them?
- Can they suggest other evidence you might consider?
- Are the criteria and means for validating the evidence clear, relevant, and convincing?
- Can they think of other ways to validate the evidence that you might consider?
Step 8: Carry out the contract. as you work on it you may find that your notions about what you want to learn and how you want to learn changing.
Step 9: Evaluation of your learning.